Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 0612ea00 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

rcu: documentation 1Q09 update



Update the RCU documentation to call out the need for callers of
primitives like call_rcu() and synchronize_rcu() to prevent subsequent RCU
readers from hazard.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent be50b834
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+12 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -298,3 +298,15 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!

	Note that, rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() relate to
	SRCU just as they do to other forms of RCU.

15.	The whole point of call_rcu(), synchronize_rcu(), and friends
	is to wait until all pre-existing readers have finished before
	carrying out some otherwise-destructive operation.  It is
	therefore critically important to -first- remove any path
	that readers can follow that could be affected by the
	destructive operation, and -only- -then- invoke call_rcu(),
	synchronize_rcu(), or friends.

	Because these primitives only wait for pre-existing readers,
	it is the caller's responsibility to guarantee safety to
	any subsequent readers.