Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 0527a60c authored by philipl@overt.org's avatar philipl@overt.org Committed by Pierre Ossman
Browse files

ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers



The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.

The existing code assumes that if a cardbus controller is,
present, then it must be the one to manipulate - but the real
rule is that you manipulate PCI function 0. This patch adds an
additional constraint that the target must be function 0.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPhilip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
parent b30f8af3
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+11 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -11,9 +11,10 @@

/*
 * This is a conceptually ridiculous driver, but it is required by the way
 * the Ricoh multi-function R5C832 works. This chip implements firewire
 * and four different memory card controllers. Two of those controllers are
 * an SDHCI controller and a proprietary MMC controller. The linux SDHCI
 * the Ricoh multi-function chips (R5CXXX) work. These chips implement
 * the four main memory card controllers (SD, MMC, MS, xD) and one or both
 * of cardbus or firewire. It happens that they implement SD and MMC
 * support as separate controllers (and PCI functions). The linux SDHCI
 * driver supports MMC cards but the chip detects MMC cards in hardware
 * and directs them to the MMC controller - so the SDHCI driver never sees
 * them. To get around this, we must disable the useless MMC controller.
@@ -21,8 +22,10 @@
 * a detection event occurs immediately, even if the MMC card is already
 * in the reader.
 *
 * The relevant registers live on the firewire function, so this is unavoidably
 * ugly. Such is life.
 * It seems to be the case that the relevant PCI registers to deactivate the
 * MMC controller live on PCI function 0, which might be the cardbus controller
 * or the firewire controller, depending on the particular chip in question. As
 * such, it makes what this driver has to do unavoidably ugly. Such is life.
 */

#include <linux/pci.h>
@@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
		pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
			PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476, fw_dev))) {
		if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
		    PCI_FUNC(fw_dev->devfn) == 0 &&
		    pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
			if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
				return -ENODEV;
@@ -160,6 +164,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
	    (fw_dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
					PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C832, fw_dev))) {
		if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
		    PCI_FUNC(fw_dev->devfn) == 0 &&
		    pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
			if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
				return -ENODEV;
@@ -172,7 +177,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,

	if (!ctrlfound) {
		printk(KERN_WARNING DRIVER_NAME
		       ": Main firewire function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
		       ": Main Ricoh function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
		return -ENODEV;
	}