+13
−6
Loading
Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more
We don't need to keep openowners around in the >=4.1 case, because they
aren't needed to handle CLOSE replays any more (that's a problem for
sessions). And doing so causes unexpected failures on a subsequent
destroy_clientid to fail.
We probably also need something comparable for lock owners on last
unlock.
Signed-off-by:
J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>