Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 66940f35 authored by Michael S. Tsirkin's avatar Michael S. Tsirkin Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

ptr_ring: document usage around __ptr_ring_peek



This explains why is the net usage of __ptr_ring_peek
actually ok without locks.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d542296a
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -174,6 +174,15 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_produce_bh(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr)
 * if they dereference the pointer - see e.g. PTR_RING_PEEK_CALL.
 * If ring is never resized, and if the pointer is merely
 * tested, there's no need to take the lock - see e.g.  __ptr_ring_empty.
 * However, if called outside the lock, and if some other CPU
 * consumes ring entries at the same time, the value returned
 * is not guaranteed to be correct.
 * In this case - to avoid incorrectly detecting the ring
 * as empty - the CPU consuming the ring entries is responsible
 * for either consuming all ring entries until the ring is empty,
 * or synchronizing with some other CPU and causing it to
 * execute __ptr_ring_peek and/or consume the ring enteries
 * after the synchronization point.
 */
static inline void *__ptr_ring_peek(struct ptr_ring *r)
{
@@ -182,10 +191,7 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_peek(struct ptr_ring *r)
	return NULL;
}

/* Note: callers invoking this in a loop must use a compiler barrier,
 * for example cpu_relax(). Callers must take consumer_lock
 * if the ring is ever resized - see e.g. ptr_ring_empty.
 */
/* See __ptr_ring_peek above for locking rules. */
static inline bool __ptr_ring_empty(struct ptr_ring *r)
{
	return !__ptr_ring_peek(r);