Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 526d9634 authored by Chen Yu's avatar Chen Yu Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

x86/microcode/intel: Check patch signature before saving microcode for early loading



commit 1a371e67dc77125736cc56d3a0893f06b75855b6 upstream.

Currently, scan_microcode() leverages microcode_matches() to check
if the microcode matches the CPU by comparing the family and model.
However, the processor stepping and flags of the microcode signature
should also be considered when saving a microcode patch for early
update.

Use find_matching_signature() in scan_microcode() and get rid of the
now-unused microcode_matches() which is a good cleanup in itself.

Complete the verification of the patch being saved for early loading in
save_microcode_patch() directly. This needs to be done there too because
save_mc_for_early() will call save_microcode_patch() too.

The second reason why this needs to be done is because the loader still
tries to support, at least hypothetically, mixed-steppings systems and
thus adds all patches to the cache that belong to the same CPU model
albeit with different steppings.

For example:

  microcode: CPU: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6
  microcode: mc_saved[0]: sig=0x906e9, pf=0x2a, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23
  microcode: mc_saved[1]: sig=0x906ea, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27
  microcode: mc_saved[2]: sig=0x906eb, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23
  microcode: mc_saved[3]: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27
  microcode: mc_saved[4]: sig=0x906ed, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23

The patch which is being saved for early loading, however, can only be
the one which fits the CPU this runs on so do the signature verification
before saving.

 [ bp: Do signature verification in save_microcode_patch()
       and rewrite commit message. ]

Fixes: ec400dde ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208535
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113015923.13960-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 3863935f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −53
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -103,53 +103,6 @@ static int has_newer_microcode(void *mc, unsigned int csig, int cpf, int new_rev
	return find_matching_signature(mc, csig, cpf);
}

/*
 * Given CPU signature and a microcode patch, this function finds if the
 * microcode patch has matching family and model with the CPU.
 *
 * %true - if there's a match
 * %false - otherwise
 */
static bool microcode_matches(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
			      unsigned long sig)
{
	unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
	unsigned long data_size = get_datasize(mc_header);
	struct extended_sigtable *ext_header;
	unsigned int fam_ucode, model_ucode;
	struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
	unsigned int fam, model;
	int ext_sigcount, i;

	fam   = x86_family(sig);
	model = x86_model(sig);

	fam_ucode   = x86_family(mc_header->sig);
	model_ucode = x86_model(mc_header->sig);

	if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode)
		return true;

	/* Look for ext. headers: */
	if (total_size <= data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE)
		return false;

	ext_header   = (void *) mc_header + data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE;
	ext_sig      = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
	ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;

	for (i = 0; i < ext_sigcount; i++) {
		fam_ucode   = x86_family(ext_sig->sig);
		model_ucode = x86_model(ext_sig->sig);

		if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode)
			return true;

		ext_sig++;
	}
	return false;
}

static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
{
	struct ucode_patch *p;
@@ -167,7 +120,7 @@ static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
	return p;
}

static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
static void save_microcode_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, void *data, unsigned int size)
{
	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr;
	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL;
@@ -213,6 +166,9 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
	if (!p)
		return;

	if (!find_matching_signature(p->data, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf))
		return;

	/*
	 * Save for early loading. On 32-bit, that needs to be a physical
	 * address as the APs are running from physical addresses, before
@@ -347,13 +303,14 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save)

		size -= mc_size;

		if (!microcode_matches(mc_header, uci->cpu_sig.sig)) {
		if (!find_matching_signature(data, uci->cpu_sig.sig,
					     uci->cpu_sig.pf)) {
			data += mc_size;
			continue;
		}

		if (save) {
			save_microcode_patch(data, mc_size);
			save_microcode_patch(uci, data, mc_size);
			goto next;
		}

@@ -486,14 +443,14 @@ static void show_saved_mc(void)
 * Save this microcode patch. It will be loaded early when a CPU is
 * hot-added or resumes.
 */
static void save_mc_for_early(u8 *mc, unsigned int size)
static void save_mc_for_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, u8 *mc, unsigned int size)
{
	/* Synchronization during CPU hotplug. */
	static DEFINE_MUTEX(x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);

	mutex_lock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);

	save_microcode_patch(mc, size);
	save_microcode_patch(uci, mc, size);
	show_saved_mc();

	mutex_unlock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
@@ -937,7 +894,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
	 * permanent memory. So it will be loaded early when a CPU is hot added
	 * or resumes.
	 */
	save_mc_for_early(new_mc, new_mc_size);
	save_mc_for_early(uci, new_mc, new_mc_size);

	pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
		 cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);