Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 525a4f93 authored by Paulo Zanoni's avatar Paulo Zanoni Committed by Daniel Vetter
Browse files

drm/i915/fbc: add comments to the FBC auxiliary structs



I wrote this code an year and a half ago and I couldn't exactly
remember the main differences of these two structures when reviewing a
new FBC patch. Add some comments to help explain what's the purpose of
each struct.

For the record, the original commits are:
 b183b3f1 ("drm/i915/fbc: introduce struct intel_fbc_reg_params")
 aaf78d27 ("drm/i915/fbc: introduce struct intel_fbc_state_cache")

Cc: Praveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170714193822.12121-1-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 746a5173
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+12 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1058,6 +1058,11 @@ struct intel_fbc {
	bool underrun_detected;
	struct work_struct underrun_work;

	/*
	 * Due to the atomic rules we can't access some structures without the
	 * appropriate locking, so we cache information here in order to avoid
	 * these problems.
	 */
	struct intel_fbc_state_cache {
		struct i915_vma *vma;

@@ -1079,6 +1084,13 @@ struct intel_fbc {
		} fb;
	} state_cache;

	/*
	 * This structure contains everything that's relevant to program the
	 * hardware registers. When we want to figure out if we need to disable
	 * and re-enable FBC for a new configuration we just check if there's
	 * something different in the struct. The genx_fbc_activate functions
	 * are supposed to read from it in order to program the registers.
	 */
	struct intel_fbc_reg_params {
		struct i915_vma *vma;