Loading fs/ubifs/budget.c +2 −2 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ int ubifs_calc_min_idx_lebs(struct ubifs_info *c) idx_size = c->old_idx_sz + c->budg_idx_growth + c->budg_uncommitted_idx; /* And make sure we have trice the index size of space reserved */ /* And make sure we have thrice the index size of space reserved */ idx_size = idx_size + (idx_size << 1); /* Loading Loading @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int can_use_rp(struct ubifs_info *c) * This function makes sure UBIFS has enough free eraseblocks for index growth * and data. * * When budgeting index space, UBIFS reserves trice as more LEBs as the index * When budgeting index space, UBIFS reserves thrice as many LEBs as the index * would take if it was consolidated and written to the flash. This guarantees * that the "in-the-gaps" commit method always succeeds and UBIFS will always * be able to commit dirty index. So this function basically adds amount of Loading fs/ubifs/find.c +1 −1 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ int ubifs_find_dirty_leb(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_lprops *ret_lp, idx_lp = idx_heap->arr[0]; sum = idx_lp->free + idx_lp->dirty; /* * Since we reserve trice as more space for the index than it * Since we reserve thrice as much space for the index than it * actually takes, it does not make sense to pick indexing LEBs * with less than, say, half LEB of dirty space. May be half is * not the optimal boundary - this should be tested and Loading Loading
fs/ubifs/budget.c +2 −2 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ int ubifs_calc_min_idx_lebs(struct ubifs_info *c) idx_size = c->old_idx_sz + c->budg_idx_growth + c->budg_uncommitted_idx; /* And make sure we have trice the index size of space reserved */ /* And make sure we have thrice the index size of space reserved */ idx_size = idx_size + (idx_size << 1); /* Loading Loading @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int can_use_rp(struct ubifs_info *c) * This function makes sure UBIFS has enough free eraseblocks for index growth * and data. * * When budgeting index space, UBIFS reserves trice as more LEBs as the index * When budgeting index space, UBIFS reserves thrice as many LEBs as the index * would take if it was consolidated and written to the flash. This guarantees * that the "in-the-gaps" commit method always succeeds and UBIFS will always * be able to commit dirty index. So this function basically adds amount of Loading
fs/ubifs/find.c +1 −1 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ int ubifs_find_dirty_leb(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_lprops *ret_lp, idx_lp = idx_heap->arr[0]; sum = idx_lp->free + idx_lp->dirty; /* * Since we reserve trice as more space for the index than it * Since we reserve thrice as much space for the index than it * actually takes, it does not make sense to pick indexing LEBs * with less than, say, half LEB of dirty space. May be half is * not the optimal boundary - this should be tested and Loading