Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit c05b9339 authored by Johan Hedberg's avatar Johan Hedberg Committed by Marcel Holtmann
Browse files

Bluetooth: Fix ignoring unknown SMP authentication requirement bits



The SMP specification states that we should ignore any unknown bits from
the authentication requirement. We already have a define for masking out
unknown bits but we haven't used it in all places so far. This patch
adds usage of the AUTH_REQ_MASK to all places that need it and ensures
that we don't pass unknown bits onward to other functions.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
parent 3a7dbfb8
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+13 −9
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -949,8 +949,11 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
	if (!smp)
		return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;

	/* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */
	auth = req->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK;

	if (!test_bit(HCI_BONDABLE, &hdev->dev_flags) &&
	    (req->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
	    (auth & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
		return SMP_PAIRING_NOTSUPP;

	SMP_DISALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ);
@@ -959,9 +962,6 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
	memcpy(&smp->preq[1], req, sizeof(*req));
	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*req));

	/* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */
	auth = req->auth_req;

	sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(auth);
	if (sec_level > conn->hcon->pending_sec_level)
		conn->hcon->pending_sec_level = sec_level;
@@ -1024,6 +1024,8 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
	if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size))
		return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE;

	auth = rsp->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK;

	/* If we need MITM check that it can be acheived */
	if (conn->hcon->pending_sec_level >= BT_SECURITY_HIGH) {
		u8 method;
@@ -1044,7 +1046,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
	 */
	smp->remote_key_dist &= rsp->resp_key_dist;

	auth = (req->auth_req | rsp->auth_req);
	auth |= req->auth_req;

	ret = tk_request(conn, 0, auth, req->io_capability, rsp->io_capability);
	if (ret)
@@ -1160,7 +1162,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
	struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
	struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
	struct smp_chan *smp;
	u8 sec_level;
	u8 sec_level, auth;

	BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);

@@ -1170,7 +1172,9 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
	if (hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
		return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;

	sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req);
	auth = rp->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK;

	sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(auth);
	if (smp_sufficient_security(hcon, sec_level))
		return 0;

@@ -1185,13 +1189,13 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
		return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;

	if (!test_bit(HCI_BONDABLE, &hcon->hdev->dev_flags) &&
	    (rp->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
	    (auth & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
		return SMP_PAIRING_NOTSUPP;

	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));

	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
	build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, rp->auth_req);
	build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, auth);

	smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
	memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));