Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit b5d17794 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Daniel Vetter
Browse files

drm/i915: Wait upon the last request seqno, rather than a future seqno



In commit 69c2fc89
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Fri Jul 20 12:41:03 2012 +0100

    drm/i915: Remove the per-ring write list

the explicit flush was removed from i915_ring_idle(). However, we
continued to wait upon the next seqno which now did not correspond to
any request (except for the unusual condition of a failure to queue a
request after execbuffer) and so would wait indefinitely.

This has an important side-effect that i915_gpu_idle() does not cause
the seqno to be incremented. This is vital if we are to be able to idle
the GPU to handle seqno wraparound, as in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 4f1ba0f8
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+21 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2462,10 +2462,29 @@ i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)

static int i915_ring_idle(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
{
	if (list_empty(&ring->active_list))
	u32 seqno;
	int ret;

	/* We need to add any requests required to flush the objects */
	if (!list_empty(&ring->active_list)) {
		seqno = list_entry(ring->active_list.prev,
				   struct drm_i915_gem_object,
				   ring_list)->last_read_seqno;

		ret = i915_gem_check_olr(ring, seqno);
		if (ret)
			return ret;
	}

	/* Wait upon the last request to be completed */
	if (list_empty(&ring->request_list))
		return 0;

	return i915_wait_seqno(ring, i915_gem_next_request_seqno(ring));
	seqno = list_entry(ring->request_list.prev,
			   struct drm_i915_gem_request,
			   list)->seqno;

	return i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno);
}

int i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev)