Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit a9ad8526 authored by Jonathan Brassow's avatar Jonathan Brassow Committed by NeilBrown
Browse files

DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each 



Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe

Commit dafb20fa mistakenly replaced a safe
iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
parent afbaa90b

drivers/md/dm-raid.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs) 
	int ret;

	unsigned redundancy = 0;

	struct raid_dev *dev;

	struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest;

	struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest;

	struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;



	switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs) 
	}



	freshest = NULL;

	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {

	rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {

		if (!rdev->meta_bdev)

			continue;