Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Skip to content
Commit 8ac2c867 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller
Browse files

Merge branch 'bpf-per-cpu-maps'

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
bpf: introduce per-cpu maps

We've started to use bpf to trace every packet and atomic add
instruction (event JITed) started to show up in perf profile.
The solution is to do per-cpu counters.
For PERCPU_(HASH|ARRAY) map the existing bpf_map_lookup() helper
returns per-cpu area which bpf programs can use to store and
increment the counters. The BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM syscall command
returns areas from all cpus and user process aggregates the counters.
The usage example is in patch 6. The api turned out to be very
easy to use from bpf program and from user space.
Long term we were discussing to add 'bounded loop' instruction,
so bpf programs can do aggregation within the program which may
help some use cases. Right now user space aggregation of
per-cpu counters fits the best.

This patch set is new approach for per-cpu hash and array maps.
I've reused the map tests written by Martin and Ming, but
implementation and api is new. Old discussion here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2123800/focus=2126435


====================

Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parents ba905f5e 3059303f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment