Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 5378c2e6 authored by Veaceslav Falico's avatar Veaceslav Falico Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

bonding: move bond-specific init after enslave happens



As Jiri noted, currently we first do all bonding-specific initialization
(specifically - bond_select_active_slave(bond)) before we actually attach
the slave (so that it becomes visible through bond_for_each_slave() and
friends). This might result in bond_select_active_slave() not seeing the
first/new slave and, thus, not actually selecting an active slave.

Fix this by moving all the bond-related init part after we've actually
completely initialized and linked (via bond_master_upper_dev_link()) the
new slave.

Also, remove the bond_(de/a)ttach_slave(), it's useless to have functions
to ++/-- one int.

After this we have all the initialization of the new slave *before*
linking, and all the stuff that needs to be done on bonding *after* it. It
has also a bonus effect - we can remove the locking on the new slave init
completely, and only use it for bond_select_active_slave().

Reported-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDing <Tianhong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 666d1008
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+14 −51
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -967,33 +967,6 @@ void bond_select_active_slave(struct bonding *bond)
	}
}

/*--------------------------- slave list handling ---------------------------*/

/*
 * This function attaches the slave to the end of list.
 *
 * bond->lock held for writing by caller.
 */
static void bond_attach_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave)
{
	bond->slave_cnt++;
}

/*
 * This function detaches the slave from the list.
 * WARNING: no check is made to verify if the slave effectively
 * belongs to <bond>.
 * Nothing is freed on return, structures are just unchained.
 * If any slave pointer in bond was pointing to <slave>,
 * it should be changed by the calling function.
 *
 * bond->lock held for writing by caller.
 */
static void bond_detach_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
{
	bond->slave_cnt--;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
static inline int slave_enable_netpoll(struct slave *slave)
{
@@ -1471,22 +1444,13 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
		goto err_close;
	}

	write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);

	prev_slave = bond_last_slave(bond);
	bond_attach_slave(bond, new_slave);

	new_slave->delay = 0;
	new_slave->link_failure_count = 0;

	write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);

	bond_compute_features(bond);

	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);

	read_lock(&bond->lock);

	new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies -
		(msecs_to_jiffies(bond->params.arp_interval) + 1);
	for (i = 0; i < BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS; i++)
@@ -1547,12 +1511,9 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
		}
	}

	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);

	switch (bond->params.mode) {
	case BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP:
		bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(new_slave);
		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
		break;
	case BOND_MODE_8023AD:
		/* in 802.3ad mode, the internal mechanism
@@ -1578,7 +1539,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
	case BOND_MODE_ALB:
		bond_set_active_slave(new_slave);
		bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(new_slave);
		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
		break;
	default:
		pr_debug("This slave is always active in trunk mode\n");
@@ -1596,10 +1556,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
		break;
	} /* switch(bond_mode) */

	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);

	bond_set_carrier(bond);

#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
	slave_dev->npinfo = bond->dev->npinfo;
	if (slave_dev->npinfo) {
@@ -1614,8 +1570,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
	}
#endif

	read_unlock(&bond->lock);

	res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
					 new_slave);
	if (res) {
@@ -1629,6 +1583,17 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
		goto err_unregister;
	}

	bond->slave_cnt++;
	bond_compute_features(bond);
	bond_set_carrier(bond);

	if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
		read_lock(&bond->lock);
		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
		read_unlock(&bond->lock);
	}

	pr_info("%s: enslaving %s as a%s interface with a%s link.\n",
		bond_dev->name, slave_dev->name,
@@ -1648,7 +1613,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)

	vlan_vids_del_by_dev(slave_dev, bond_dev);
	write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
	bond_detach_slave(bond, new_slave);
	if (bond->primary_slave == new_slave)
		bond->primary_slave = NULL;
	if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) {
@@ -1686,7 +1650,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
	kfree(new_slave);

err_undo_flags:
	bond_compute_features(bond);
	/* Enslave of first slave has failed and we need to fix master's mac */
	if (!bond_has_slaves(bond) &&
	    ether_addr_equal(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->dev_addr))
@@ -1740,6 +1703,9 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,

	write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);

	/* release the slave from its bond */
	bond->slave_cnt--;

	bond_upper_dev_unlink(bond_dev, slave_dev);
	/* unregister rx_handler early so bond_handle_frame wouldn't be called
	 * for this slave anymore.
@@ -1764,9 +1730,6 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,

	bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;

	/* release the slave from its bond */
	bond_detach_slave(bond, slave);

	if (!all && !bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
		if (ether_addr_equal(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave->perm_hwaddr) &&
		    bond_has_slaves(bond))