Donate to e Foundation | Murena handsets with /e/OS | Own a part of Murena! Learn more

Commit 0f352e53 authored by Michal Hocko's avatar Michal Hocko Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

mm: remove __GFP_NOFAIL is deprecated comment



Commit 64775719 ("mm: clarify __GFP_NOFAIL deprecation status") was
incomplete and didn't remove the comment about __GFP_NOFAIL being
deprecated in buffered_rmqueue.

Let's get rid of this leftover but keep the WARN_ON_ONCE for order > 1
because we should really discourage from using __GFP_NOFAIL with higher
order allocations because those are just too subtle.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 95813b8f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+5 −13
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2350,19 +2350,11 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
		list_del(&page->lru);
		pcp->count--;
	} else {
		if (unlikely(gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL)) {
		/*
			 * __GFP_NOFAIL is not to be used in new code.
			 *
			 * All __GFP_NOFAIL callers should be fixed so that they
			 * properly detect and handle allocation failures.
			 *
		 * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
			 * allocate greater than order-1 page units with
			 * __GFP_NOFAIL.
		 * allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
		 */
			WARN_ON_ONCE(order > 1);
		}
		WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
		spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);

		page = NULL;